How did supports and opponents of the Constitution argue for and against its adoption?

How did supports and opponents of the Constitution argue for and against its adoption?

The Federalists, composed of many of the Founders, supported the Constitution. They claimed that only a strong national government could protect the nation from enemies abroad and solve the country’s internal problems. The strongest argument, however, was that the Constitution contained no bill of rights.

How did Supporters and opponents of the Constitution argue for and against its adoption quizlet?

How did supporters and opponents of the Constitution argue for and against its adoption? -The Anti-Federalists – criticized the Constitution for having been drafted in secret.

How did the Constitutional Convention reflect compromises between the states competing interests quizlet?

How did the Constitutional Convention reflect compromises between the states’ competing interests? They compromised by giving Congress the power to regulate both interstate commerce and commerce with foreign countries and Congress could not ban the slave trade until 1808.

Why do you think that inland farmers and laborers supported the views of the Anti-Federalists?

The other group, called the Anti-Federalists, opposed the new Constitution. They drew support largely from the inland farmers and laborers, who feared a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists’ strongest argument, how-ever, was that the Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights.

What were the 3 main arguments of the anti-federalists against the constitution?

fears that Congress might seize too many powers under the necessary and proper clause; concerns that republican government could not work in a land the size of the United States; and their most successful argument against the adoption of the Constitution — the lack of a bill of rights to protect individual liberties.

Why was the Constitution a controversial document even as it was being written quizlet?

they wanted the power to be in the state because they were extremely distrustful of authority. They opposed the constitution because there was no bill of rights. The constitution brought up issues about a central government.

What were the strengths and weaknesses of our nation’s first government quizlet?

What were the strengths and weaknesses of our nations’ first government? Strengths were that they were able to create towns and create a military. Weaknesses were that it was near anarchy and had basically no order or responsibility.

What are 6 basic principles of the Constitution?

The six underlying principles of the Constitution are popular sovereignty, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, and limited government.

Why did the Anti-Federalists oppose the Constitution?

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

Did the Federalists support the Constitution?

Led by Alexander Hamilton, albeit secretly at first, the Federalists were the first political party of the United States. They supported the Constitution, and attempted to convince the States to ratify the document.

Why did the Anti federalists oppose the Constitution?

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

What was the main argument for ratifying the Constitution?

An argument there were three basic issues, whether the Constitution would maintain the republican government, the national government would have too much power, and the bill of rights was needed in the Constitution. The new Constitution was set to take effect as soon as nine states ratified it.

Why did the federalists not want a Bill of Rights?

Because the three branches were equal, none could assume control over the other. When challenged over the lack of individual liberties, the Federalists argued that the Constitution did not include a bill of rights because the new Constitution did not vest in the new government the authority to suppress individual liberties.

Why was the separation of powers important to the Constitution?

In light of charges that the Constitution created a strong national government, they were able to argue that the separation of powers among the three branches of government protected the rights of the people. Because the three branches were equal, none could assume control over the other.