What was the precedent set in Shaw v Reno?

What was the precedent set in Shaw v Reno?

Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.

How did the Supreme Court rule in Shaw v Reno?

The Court ruled that claims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny, meaning that any law that results in classification by race must have a compelling government interest, be narrowly tailored to meet that goal, and be the least restrictive means for achieving that interest.

Which of the following represents the outcome in Shaw v Reno 1991 )?

Which of the following represents the outcome in Shaw v. Reno (1991)? Evidence of widespread fraud and abuse involving the Veterans Affairs comes to light.

Why was Shaw v Reno 1993 an important decision in terms of minority representation quizlet?

Shaw v. Reno is an important decision because it represents a conservative shift on the Court. Yes; the Court agreed that the shape of the proposed district was so odd that there was no compelling explanation for its shape other than separating voters by race.

Was Shaw v Reno unconstitutional?

… importance of equal-protection claims (Shaw v. Reno [1993]), declared unconstitutional district boundaries that are “unexplainable on grounds other than race” (Bush v.

Why was Baker v Carr brought to Court?

The case arose from a lawsuit against the state of Tennessee, which had not conducted redistricting since 1901. The state of Tennessee argued that the composition of legislative districts constituted a nonjusticiable political question, as the U.S. Supreme Court had held in Colegrove v. Green (1946).

What was the decision in Baker v Carr quizlet?

Terms in this set (2) Decision: The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker. A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment.

What was the impact of Shaw v Reno quizlet?

The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause. -The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.

When was Shaw v Reno decided?

1993
Shaw v. Reno/Dates decided

What was the problem in Baker v Carr?

Carr, (1962), U.S. Supreme Court case that forced the Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself on the basis of population. Traditionally, particularly in the South, the populations of rural areas had been overrepresented in legislatures in proportion to those of urban and suburban areas.

What was the vote in Baker v Carr?

The Court split 6 to 2 in ruling that Baker’s case was justiciable, producing, in addition to the opinion of the Court by Justice William J. Brennan, three concurring opinions and two dissenting opinions.

What was the issue in Baker v Carr?